DLVX editorial workflow: adapted teaching templates

These are reusable adaptations, not verbatim original prompts.

Reader: [who is making a decision]
Decision: [what they should be able to decide]
Question: [one precise question]
Geography and language: [scope]
Evidence cutoff and forecast horizon: [dates]

Return original source links. For each material claim give:
publication date; data period; what was counted;
what the evidence supports; what it does not support.
Find the strongest evidence against our proposed position.
Keep measured results, vendor claims and our opinions separate.
Do not invent examples from our business.

Review the attached draft against the original sources.
Do not rewrite it yet.

For each material problem, return:
the exact sentence; source passage or location;
why the sentence exceeds the evidence;
the smallest correction that resolves it.

Check dates, populations, denominators and causal language.
Look for a single example expanded into a general claim.
Identify the strongest missing counterargument.
Mark anything you could not verify. Agreement is not proof.

Claim | Original source | Data period | Allowed wording | Limitation
[Fill one row for each claim that could change a reader's decision.]

Before publication:
Resolve every material review finding.
Recheck claims changed after review.
Label predictions and illustrative examples.
Confirm permission for screenshots and quotations.

After publication:
Open the actual public URL on desktop and mobile.
Follow source links and test the important controls.
Confirm the delivered copy matches the approved version.
Record unresolved issues and the person who owns them.